The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

GOKARNA PLATES OF KADAMBA KAMADEVA : SAKA 1177

Alagiyaśīyan Śambuvarāya,[1] Kulōttuṅgaśōla Śambuvarāya,[2] Kulōttuṅgaśōla Vāṇakōvaraiyar[3] assumed the appellations of their masters Vikrama-Chōḷa, Alagiyaśīyan and Kulōttuṅga-Chōḷa respectively. The adoption of the epithet Puviāḷappirandān by Nīlagaṅgaraiyan only shows his subordination to the Kāḍava chief.

Further, Mr. Vaidyanathan accepts that this Nīlagaṅgaraiyar hailed from Āmūr in the Chingleput District, far away from the Kūḍal of Kōpperuñjiṅga. He also feels that the epithet Pañchanadivāṇan applied to this officer is not favourable to his identification, yet he takes him as another son of Kōpperuñjiṅga, admitting at the same time that Nīlagaṅgaraiyar may not be a member of the Kāḍava family. It will thus be evident that the genealogy given by Mr. Vaidyanathan needs modification.

Finally, I may also point out a few errors that have crept into his article.

(1) The Pallavarāyanpēṭṭai record of Kōpperuñjiṅga is not dated in the 26th, but only in the 16th regnal year of the chief. The statement in the Annual Report in this connection has to be corrected.
(2) In No. 439 and 443 of 1921 the title Tribhuvanachakravartin noticed as having been assumed by Kōpperuñjiṅga has likewise to be corrected into [Sakalabhuvanachakra]vartin.
(3) The interpretation of No. 514 of 1918 has also to be altered. It was Kōpperuñjiṅga, and not Sōmēśvara, who built the fortifications along the north bank of the Kāvērī.
(4) There is no evidence for taking Rājēndra-Chōḷa III as the son of Rājarāja III.
(5) The utmost northern limit of Kōpperuñjiṅga’s dominion is taken as Drākshārāma in the Godavari District. The mere existence of Kōpperuñjiṅga’s inscription at that place does not prove that he had really extended his territory so far north, overthrowing the Telugu-Chōḍas and the Kākatīyas.

_____________________

Home Page

>
>