The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

NANDSA YUPA INSCRIPTIONS

Can we identify Mahāsēnāpati Bhaṭṭisōma of this fragmentary record with [Śrī?] sōma, the hero of the inscriptions A and B of the Nāndsā yūpa ? The question is difficult to answer with certainty, but the probability is that the two personages are identical. It is true that the title Mahāsēnāpati is not given to [Śrī ?]sōma in inscriptions A and B. The records however make it clear that he was a distinguished general, who had a number of victories to his credit, and there is nothing improbable in the Mālavas having formally conferred that title upon [Śrī ?]sōma in recognition of his great services to the republic. A Yaudhēya record, no doubt about two centuries later in date, shows that the titles Mahārāja and Mahāsēnāpati were conferred upon the highest dignitary of that republic, who was elected to the post.1 [Śrī ?]-sōma may have got this honour later than 226 A. D., when the Nāndsā yūpa records were inscribed. That the fragmentary inscription we are dealing with here was issued late in the life of Sēnāpati Bhaṭṭisōma is made clear by its referring in l. 6 to his sons and grand-sons as well established in life. In favour of the identity of Bhaṭṭisōma with [Śrī ?]sōma, it may be further pointed out (i) that the palaeography of the three records is of the same period (ii) that both [Śrī ?]sōma and Bhaṭṭisōma are described as the leader of the Sōgis and that (iii)Śrīsōma is hardly different form Bhaṭṭisōma, both Śrī and Bhaṭṭi being honorific prefixes. Inscriptions A and B refer to [Śrī ?]sōma’s benefactions in favour of gods and sages ; the fifth line of the present record, which refers to a forest āśrama of ascetics, probably mentions a similar donation of Bhaṭṭisōma. This may also lend additional weight to the view that Mahāsēnāpati Bhaṭṭisōma is identical with [Śrī ?]sōma.

>

TEXT[2]

INSCRIPTION C

(Sanskrit)

_______________________________________________

[1] Fleet, C. I. I. Vol. III, p. 252.
[2] From ink-impression.
[3] The letter sva looks like .
[4] The letter was probably at the end of the previous line.
[5]The restoration of is conjectural.
[6] The turning of the curve for the medial mātrā u to the right is a peculiarity shared by this inscription with inscriptions A and B. Compare kūpa in A, l. 4 and B, l. 10. [7] Letters nārthāṁ are carelessly engraved and tha is rather faint.

Home Page

>
>