The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

As noted above, Gōvindarāja had married Vinayavatī, whose father, Vikramāditya, is described in ll. 42-3 as chatar-ddig-addhipa ‘lord of the four directions’. This suggests that Vikramāditya was a powerful king. And the only renowned king of this name at that period, that is to say, about the middle of the 8thcentury A.D., could be Vikramādiya II of the Western Chālukyas of Bādāmi, whose reign is placed between A. D. 733-34 and A. D. 746-47.[1] It is, therefore, plausible to identify Vinayavatī’s father with Vikramāditya II.

The object of the inscription is to register some gifts of land near the village Komāramaṅgala in the Pudukanda vishaya to one Nīlakaṇṭha, the youngest of the five sons of Nīlakaṇṭha of the Harita gōtra and the Prāvachana charaṇa.

It is not clear who the donor of the grant was. The reading vijñāpitāya putrāya Duggamārāya, etc., in ll. 47-8, has to be construed with Śrīpurusha-prathama-nāmadhēyēna Pṛithuvī-koṅgaṇi-mahārājēna in ll. 37-8. The engraver seems to have omitted something here and hence the difficulty about the anvaya. We may, however, interpret the whole passage as follows : At the request of his queen Kāñchiyabbā, Dugggamāra obtained the grant from his father Śrīpurusha and in turn made it over to a Brāhmaṇa. The name of this Brāhmaṇa and the details of the grant have been given subsequently in the text. The grant seems to have been made for the benefit of Kañchiyabbā’s brother Indarāja, whose death is referred to just before the grant-portion in the text.

>

The date of the inscription is given in ll. 50-1 as Śaka 693, Chandra(Bhādra)pada Śukla [2], Uttara-Phalgunī nakshatra, Śukravāra, which regularly corresponds to Friday, 16th August A. D. 771, when the nakshatra was Uttara-Phalgunī. The way in which the number 93 is expressed, viz., navati-tri-saṁvatsara is not correct Sanskrit. It may, however, be due to the influence of the Dravidian style.

As regards the places mentioned in the record, the village Komaramaṅgala is to be identified with Komāramaṅgalam in the Tiruchengode taluk of the Salem District. It lies at a distance of about 30 miles from Salem where the plates were found. The List of Villages in the Madras Presidency gives a number of places in the Salem District, which go by the name of Pudur. One of them may be identified with the Pudukanda of the inscription.2

TEXT3

First Plate

1 Ōṁ4 Svasti jitam=bhagavatā gata-ghana-gagan-ābhēna Padmanābhēna [|*] Śrīmat-Jāhna-
vēya5-kul-āmala-vyō-
2 m-āvabhāsana-bhāskara6-sva-khaḍg-aika-prahāra-khaṇḍita-mahā-śilā-stambha-labdha-bala-
parākra-
3 mō dāruṇ-āri-gaṇa-vidāraṇ-ōpalabdha-vraṇa-vibhūshaṇa-bhūshitaḥ Kāṇvāyana-sagōtraḥ
śrīmat-Ko-
4 ṅgaṇivarmma-dharmma-mahādhirājaḥ7 tasya putraḥ pitur=anvāgata-guṇa-yuktō vidyā-
vinaya-vihita-
5 vṛittaḥ samyak-prajā-pālana-mātr-ādhigata-rājya-prayōjanō vidvat-kavi-kāñchana-ni-
kash-ō-

_____________________

[1]Bom. Gaz., Vol. I, pt. ii, Chart opposite p. 336.
[2] I am obliged to Mr. N. Lakshminarayan Rao, for his kind suggestions in connection with this article.
[3] From the original plates and inked estampages.
[4] Expressed by a symbol.
[5] Read : Śrīmaj-Jāhnavēya-,
[6] Better read ; bhaskaraḥ sva-
[7] Here sandhi has not been observed.

Home Page

>
>