The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

PHERAVA GRANT OF SAMANTAVARMAN, KING OF KALINGA, YEAR 185 109

The alphabet is of the southern type such as is used in the early Gaṅga records, and is very neatly engraved. For this reason it offers a great contrast to that of the Dhanantara plates[1] of king Sāmantavarman. In spite of slight differences, the alphabets of these two plates show essentially the same characteristics, and may be referred to the sixth or seventh century A. D.

The language is Sanskrit. With the exception of the five imprecatory verses at the end (ll. 18-24) the inscription is written in prose. As compared with the other Gaṅga records, the language is fairly correct and the mistakes are very few.

As regards orthography the following points may be noted. Consonants are doubled after r with a few exceptions such as prakarsha (l. 5), chaturbhyō (l. 11), and varsha (l. 21). Consonants k and t followed by r are also doubled. The final t is indicated by a small-sized letter with a short horizontal stroke underneath. Same sign is used for b and v, but separate sign for b is used in the conjunct mb (ll. 4, 8). Anusvāra is used in place of final m in the imprecatory verses (cf. phalaṁ in l. 20, pālanaṁ in ll. 21, 23 and 24, and bhaṅguraṁ in l. 24).

The inscription records the grant of the village of Phērava in Lauhaśṛiṅgāra vishaya as an agrahāra to four Brāhmaṇas viz. Kīrttīśaśarmā and his three sons Dēvaśaramā, Raviśarmā and Divākaraśarmā by the Gaṅga king Mahārāja Śrī-Sāmantavarman, Lord of Kaliṅga, in the year 185.[2] The grant was issued from the victorious city of Śchētaka.

>

King Sāmantavarman of the present grant may be identified with the king of the same name who issued the Dhanantara plates. The opening phraseology is the same in both with one important exception. The latter contain, as a qualifying phrase of the king, “ who has the supremacy over the whole of Śvētaka, won by the strength of his own arms ”. But in the corresponding passage of the present grant, Kaliṅga is substituted for “ the whole of Śvētaka ”, and this form is continued by all thekings of the dynasty, with the addition of ‘whole ’ (sakala) before Kaliṅga. Further, the present grant adds the epithet “ sakala-Kaliṅg-ādhipatir=Mmahārājaḥ ” (Mahārāja, the Lord of the whole of Kaliṅga) before the name of the king, whereas the other simply refers to the king as “ Śrī-Sāmantavarmā ” without any royal epithet. These differences cannot but be regarded as being deliberate, and, therefore, of material significance. It is legitimate to infer that Sāmantavarman began his career as a local chief of Śvētaka, rose to political importance by dint of his own prowess, and possibly conquered a portion of the Kaliṅga territory. For, in spite of the phrase ‘ Lord of the whole of Kaliṅga ’, it is difficult to accept, without further corroborative evidence, that Sāmantavarman’s authority extended over the whole of Kaliṅga, specially when we remember that similar claims are made on behalf of the other kings of Śvētaka, while a long line of Gaṅga kings with Kaliṅga-nagara as capital had been ruling in Kaliṅga both before and after the time of Sāmantavarman.

We know altogether twelve copper-plate grants[3] issued by the kings of the Gaṅga family from Śvētaka. They are connected by the conventional opening phrase, which practically

__________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. XV, p. 275.
[2] The reading of the date has been discussed later.
[3] These are :─
1. Dhanantara plates of Sāmantavarman (above, Vol. XV, p. 275).
2. Phērava Grant of Sāmantavarman year 185 (the present Grant).
3. Gautami plates of Indravarman (above, Vol. XXIV, p. 180).
4. N. Ganjam plates of Jayavarman (above, Vol. XXIII, p. 261).
5. Vishamagiri plates of Indravarman (above, Vol. XIX, p. 136).
6. N. Ganjam plates of Rāṇaka Jayavarman─year 100 (above, Vol. XXII, p. 268)
7. N. Ganjam plates of Bhūpēndravarman (above, Vol. XXIII, p. 265).
8. Svalpa- Velura Grant of Anantavarman (above, Vol. XXIV, p. 129).
9. Ganjam plates of Pṛithivivarman (above, Vol. IV, p. 198).
10. Badakhimedi plates of Indravarman (above, Vol. XXIII, p. 78).
11. Indian Museum plates of Indravarman (above, Vol. XXVI, p. 165).
12. N. Ganjam plates of Dānārṇavadēva (above, Vol. XXIII, p. 563).

Home Page

>
>