The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Additions and Corrections

Images

Contents

Altekar, A. S

Bhattasali, N. K

Barua, B. M And Chakravarti, Pulin Behari

Chakravarti, S. N

Chhabra, B. CH

Das Gupta

Desai, P. B

Gai, G. S

Garde, M. B

Ghoshal, R. K

Gupte, Y. R

Kedar Nath Sastri

Khare, G. H

Krishnamacharlu, C. R

Konow, Sten

Lakshminarayan Rao, N

Majumdar, R. C

Master, Alfred

Mirashi, V. V

Mirashi, V. V., And Gupte, Y. R

Narasimhaswami, H. K

Nilakanta Sastri And Venkataramayya, M

Panchamukhi, R. S

Pandeya, L. P

Raghavan, V

Ramadas, G

Sircar, Dines Chandra

Somasekhara Sarma

Subrahmanya Aiyar

Vats, Madho Sarup

Venkataramayya, M

Venkatasubba Ayyar

Vaidyanathan, K. S

Vogel, J. Ph

Index.- By M. Venkataramayya

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

EPIGRAPHIA INDICA

8 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA [ VOL. XXVII

villages named “Oontiya” in the same neighbourhood, it is not unlikely that the fort of Harivatsakōṭṭa, whose commander Jayasiṅgha was a witness to the grant, was situated somewhere in the same province. It is, however, possible to think that the expression Harivatsakōṭṭanigraha means “ the reducer (nigraha) of the fort of Harivatsakōṭṭa” and that, wherever the fort might have been situated, the person who reduced it, namely Jayasiṅgha, might have belonged to the region near about Pāṇḍaraṅgapalli, i.e., to the kingdom of Avidhēya, which closely adjoined the Kadamba territory. On this supposition, the two homonymous persons might be identical with each other. This is also in agreement with the description of Jayasiṁha given in the Aihoḷe inscription[1] of Pulikēśin II in the words :─ …..raṇē Lakshmīr=bhāvita-chāpal=api cha kṛitā śauryyēṇa yēn=ātmasāt(d)=rāj=āsīj=Jayasiṅhavallabha iti khyātaś=Chaluky-ānvayaḥ. (“ There was, of the Chalukya lineage, the king named Jayasiṁha-vallabha who in battle…..by his bravery made Fortune his own, even though she is suspected of fickleness”.)

If this identification is correct, it would follow that the Chālukyas of Bādāmi held a subordinate position under an earlier branch of the Rāshṭrakūṭas and when a suitable opportunity offered itself, they carved out an independent principality on the wreck of the kingdom of their overlords and of the Kadambas of Vaijantī.

>

Fleet assigns the Uṇḍikavāṭikā grants to “ approximately the seventh century A. D.” (Dyn. Kan. Dist., p. 386). In the matter of assigning dates to records merely on grounds of palæography, the approximation has been often too wide of the mark. For example, the Tālagunda pillar inscription[2] has been placed by Kielhorn in the 6th century A.D., whereas the latest researches have proved an earlier date, i.e., 5th century A. D., for it. Similarly, the Mālepāḍu plates of Puṇyakumāra which are considered to belong to circa A.D. 800 have to be relegated to an earlier period. Accordingly, the Uṇḍikavāṭikā grant, whose alphabet resembles closely the characters of the characters of Kadamba Kṛishṇavarman II, the Polamūru plates of Vishṇukuṇḍin Mādhavavarman Janāśraya, and the Rāmatīrtham plates of Vishṇukuṇḍin Indravarman, may reasonably be pushed back to the 6th century A.D. which agrees with the period of Abhimanyu, the grandson of Dēvarāja, father of Avidhēya (516 A.D.) of the Pāṇḍaraṅgapalli grant.

Thus, Jayasiṁha could possibly have waged war with the Kadambas in the first half of the 6th century A.D. and with the decline of the Rāshṭrakūṭas in the north of the Bhīmā and the defeat, and destruction of the Kadambas in the South, he himself or Pulikēśin I, in all probability the latter,[3] might have occupied the Kadamba territory making Bādāmi his capital. Bādāmi as already observed, was a place of some importance in the period before Jayasiṁha, since it finds mention by Ptolemy (2nd century A.D.) under the name Badiamaioi.[4]

TEXT5

1 Svasti [||*] Śaka-varshēshu chatuś-śatēshu pañcha-shashṭi-yutēshu
2 Aśvamēdh-ādi-yajñānāṁ yajvā śrauta-vidhānataḥ [ |*]
3 Hiraṇyagarbha-sambhūtaś=Chalikyō Vallabhēśvaraḥ [||1||*]
4 Dharādharēndra6-Vātāpim=ajēyam=bhūtayē bhuvaḥ [|*]
5 adhastād=uparishṭāch=cha durggam=ētad=achīkarat [||2||*]

_____________________________________

[1] Above, Vol. VI, pp. 1 ff.
[2] Above, Vol. VIII, p. 31.
[3] See foot-note 1 on page 5 above.
[4] McCrindle, Ancient India as described by Ptolemy, edited by S. N. Majumdar, p. 171.
[5] From the ink impression and photograph.
[6] [The reading Dharādharēndraṁ is also possible.─C.R.K.]

Home Page

>
>