The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 
No. Source Dynasty King Date

Language
and Alphabet

Remarks
 

MADRAS—contd.
TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT
contd.
TIRUCHIRAPPALLI TALUK—contd.Śrīraṅgam—concld.

         
194

Do., south side, facing the Nālikēṭṭānvāśal.

Vijayanagara ….

Śaka 1520, Vikārin, [Mithuna] ba. 3, Fri day, uttirāḍam= 1599, A.D., June 1, Friday, ∙55 ; ∙67. The Śaka year cited is wrong for 1521.

Tamil.

Fragmentary. Seems to record a gift (details lost) by a person (name lost) of the Ātrēya gōtra and the Āpastamba sūtra.

 

195

Do.,                 do.

 

…. ….

Śaka 1392, …eclipse.

Do.

Do. Seems to record the gift of a village as sarvamānya by a Mahāsāmanta (name lost) to the deity on the occasion of an eclipse. The details of the gift are lost.

196

Do.,                 do.

…. ….

…., Dhanus śu…, Tiruvādirai.

Do.

Do. Seems to register a gift of land in Rājarāja-vaḷanāḍu, the Nāyakkattanam of [Ti]rumalaidēva-mahārāja, as the offering (avasaram) of Chennappa-nāyakkar.

197

Do.,                 do.

…. ….

Śaka 1312 (expressed by the chronogram Rājyalōkē), Pramōda, Kārttika, Utthānadvādaśī = 1390 A.D., October 21.

Sanskrit, Grantha and Tamil.

Fragmentary. Records the gift of 30 cows and a perpetual lamp by Aṇṇappa-uḍaiyar-Chauṇḍappa, son of Viṭṭhappa of Vatsa-gōtra.

198

Do., South wall (inside) of the Chandana-maṇḍapa, proper left of Sannidhi-Garuḍa.

…. ….

Śaka 1550, Vibhava, …., Wednesday, Hastā.

Tamil

The characters are very faint and illegible. Records a poliyūṭṭu gift, the details of which cannot be made out.

199

Do., West wall (inside), south end

….

….

Śaka 1450, ….

Do.

Do. Contains a list of provisions made for conducting different festivals.

200 Do., next to No. 199 above     …. Do. Do. No. details can be made out.
  Do., same wall …. ….

Śaka 1547, Kshaya, Kārttika 15, Vriśchika śu. 5, Tuesday, Tiruvōṇam= 1626 A. D., November  14, Tuesday, ∙11, ∙82. The Śaka year cited in this and the next two Nos. is wrong for 1548.

Do.

Do. Barring the details of date other particulars contained in the record are illegible.


>
>